Cases 31 - 40 of 60
LWD PRP Group v. Alcan Corp, et al
as 14-5730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LWD PRP GROUP
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY OHIO INC., improperly captioned as Duke Energy Corporation, ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION and others
In re: Alcan Corporation, et al
as 14-503
Petitioner:
In re: ALCAN CORPORATION, captioned as Rio Tinto Alcan and pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION, BAKER HUGHES INC. and others
Buckeye Power, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 13-3672
Petitioner:
BUCKEYE POWER, INC., DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
USA v. Ronnie Duke
as 13-1594
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONNIE EDWARD DUKE
Eastover Mining Company v. Dorothy Beverly, et al
as 12-4402
Petitioner:
EASTOVER MINING COMPANY, c/o Duke Power Company
Respondent:
DOROTHY E. BEVERLY, Widow of James Beverly and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
USA v. Darnell Duke
as 12-4065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
Certification of Judgment 3:11cv00616 Western District of North Carolina
as 2:2012mc50974
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Defendant:
BlackRock Coal, LLC
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Michael T. Duke , Charles M. Holley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
USA v. Darnell Duke
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARNELL DUKES
USA v. Marvin Duke
as 11-5899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVIN DUKES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
