Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. INOAC Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv11259
Plaintiff: Bronx Ford, Inc., Van Tuyl Group, LLC as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships, City World Motors, LLC and others
Defendant: Toyoda Gosei North America Corp., INOAC Corporation, INOAC Group North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5469
Defendant / Appellee: MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff: AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5462
Defendant / Appellee: MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff: AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
Preterm-Cleveland, et al v. Attorney General of Ohio, et al
as 20-3365
Defendant: HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, MAHONING COUNTY PROSECUTOR, FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO, SECRETARY STATE MEDICAL BOARD OF OHIO and DIRECTOR OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, CAPITAL CARE NETWORK OF TOLEDO, DOCTOR SHARON LINER and others
Amicus Curiae: CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, on behalf of 125 Individual Doctors, Nurses and Health Professionals to be named; Professional Medical Associations to be named., COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, and States Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia and AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2020op45104
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, ACTAVIS LLC, and others
Plaintiff: KICKAPOO TRIBE IN KANSAS and Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Anne Arundel County, MD, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4165
Petitioner: CITY OF YUMA, AZ, CITY OF BELLEVUE, WA, CITY OF WILMINGTON, DE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified: NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVSION ASSOCIATION
City of San Jose, California et al v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019op45964
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Mortimer D. A. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Kenosha, Wisconsin, City of Wiggins, Mississippi, City of Alamogordo, New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of San Antonio, Texas v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45833
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of San Antonio, Texas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: State of Ohio
as 19-3827
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Petitioner: STATE OF OHIO
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
County of Henderson, Texas v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45684
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Henderson, Texas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?