Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Dotson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013mc00087
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Charles E. Walker, Deborah Housel, Monte D. Watkins and others
United States of America et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
United States of America , George Arnold , Laura Batsche and others
Defendant:
Atiq Abubakar Durrani, Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and Journey Lite of Cincinnati, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA v. Rodney Dotson, Jr.
as 13-6020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY S. DOTSON, JR.
Aaron et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00301
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Rebecca Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Aaron et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Sherri Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. , West Chester Medical Center, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dotson v. Colson et al
as 3:2013mc00005
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dotson
Defendant:
Roland Colson, (f/n/u) Ford, (f/n/u) Gibbs and others
Moore et al v. Gallagher et al
as 2:2012cv01163
Plaintiff:
Whitney M. Moore, DDS and Columbus Dental Care - Whitney M. Moore, DDS, Inc.
Defendant:
John F. Gallagher, NB Dental, Inc., Our Rental Paradise and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Rodney Dotson, Jr.
as 12-5662
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY S. DOTSON, JR.
McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corporation, et al v. Vernie Dotson, et al
as 12-3037
Petitioner:
MCCOY ELKHORN COAL CORPORATION and JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
VERNIE DOTSON, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES and BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
