Cases 41 - 50 of 178
San Francisco Health Plan v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, et al
as 1:2019op45893
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. a/k/a Walgreen Co., McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
San Francisco Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mario Gomez, Jr. v. USA
as 19-2046
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO FRANCISCO GOMEZ, JR.
Bloom et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11351
Plaintiff:
Environmental Protection Solutions, Inc., Daniel Christof, Jay Myers and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Elias Heard v. Francisco Quintana
as 19-5424
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIAS HEARD
John Carey, Sr. v. Francisco Quintana
as 19-5299
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN FLOYD CAREY, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Patrino v. Benitez et al
as 5:2019cv00664
Defendant:
Douglas Michael Littleton, Francisco I. Benitez, Frank Benitez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrino
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jason Sheppard v. Francisco Quintana
as 19-5234
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON C. SHEPPARD
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Scott Callahan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 19-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT O. CALLAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden, Individually, STEVEN GARCIA, Individually and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
William Tolbert, Jr. v. Francisco Quintana
as 19-5121
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM LOUIS TOLBERT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
City and County of San Francisco et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45022
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P., Kathe Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
