Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Larry Walker v. Heidi Washington
as 21-1446
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LONDRA WALKER
Crowder v. Yost et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
McKinsey Corporation, Robert Peeler, Jeremy Fishcher and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crowder, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
USA v. Steven Dent
as 21-1253
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN D. DENT, aka James Walker
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Devin Walker v. Lyneal Wainwright
as 21-3231
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVIN WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden
Lorenzo Walker v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr Inst
as 21-3197
Petitioner / Appellant:
LORENZO WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Ristovski et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 2:2021cv10452
Plaintiff:
Davon Perry, Kellie Smith, Lakeida Poe and others
Defendant:
Norwood Jewell, Alphons Iacobelli, Dennis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Victoria Whorton v. Cognitians, LLC, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTORIA A. WHORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OH PROBATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Attn: William Lashley and Carlos Walker, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OH, Attn: Debbie Lieberman and Michael Colbert, COUNSELOR SOCIAL WORKER MARRIAGE FAMILY THERAPIST BOARD, Attn: William Hegarty and others
Thomas Farr v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 21-5094
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN WALKER, JOSEPH CRUMP, O.D., LYNNDY BYRGE, fka Lynndy Houston-Fagan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS W. FARR
Ronny Walker v. Amy Robey, et al
as 21-5021
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY ROBEY, Interim Warden and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNY DEVIOD WALKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
