Cases 51 - 60 of 1,578
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
City of Bay Minette, Alabama et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2022op45018
Plaintiff:
City of Bay Minette, Alabama, Town of Loxley, Alabama and Town of Summerdale, Alabama
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Petty et al v. Springowski et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Garon F Petty, Jeanne Petty and Garon F. Petty
Defendant:
Mary Springowski, Cory Shawver, Joshua Thornsberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Price v. United States of America et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2022cv10662
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Price
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Olivares v. Performance Contracting Group et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv10574
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Olivares
Defendant:
Performance Contracting Group and Charles Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.