Cases 51 - 60 of 252
Chadwick Miller v. United States Marshal Service
as 20-3333
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
USA v. Jacqueline Key, et al
as 20-5231
Defendant / Appellant:
JACQUELINE MARSHALL KEY, TESKA KEY and JOHNNY MARSHALL, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerry Bailey, Jr. v. Mark Skytta, et al
as 20-1168
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC PETAJA, Inspector, LINCOLN MARSHALL, Deputy Warden, MARK SKYTTA, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY DOWELL BAILEY, JR.
Ahmed Alkhub v. Louisville County Jail, et al
as 20-5180
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS COUNTY JAIL & DETENTION, JOHN DOE 4, the staff (Correctional Officer) at the Lucase Jail & Detention, LOUISVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF, (John Aubrey) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMED HAMDAN ALKHUB
David CampbellIn re: David Campbell
as 20-1131
Respondent:
O'BELL T. WINN
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID MARSHALL CAMPBELL
In re: William Marshall
as 19-3972
Respondent:
NORM ROBINSON, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM MARSHALL
Anthony Sevy v. Philip Barach, et al
as 19-2038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY SEVY
Defendant:
HAROLD MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP BARACH
Cain v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv12483
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
James Smith, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 19-1614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MCFARLAND, STEVE GROSS, KELLI BYRNES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
