Cases 61 - 70 of 75
United States of America v. Heredia-Ramos
as 2:2010mj30113
Defendant:
Walter Heredia-Ramos
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Miguel Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-3325
Petitioner:
MIGUEL RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Antonio Garcia
as 10-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO RAMOS GARCIA
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv15047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type:
Other Statutes
Guilebaldo Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3866
Petitioner:
GUILEBALDO RAMOS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Jesus Ramos
as 09-1458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS RAMOS
Edwin Torres-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3334
Petitioner:
EDWIN ARNULFO TORRES-RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Thomas v. Summit County Children Services Board et al
as 5:2008cv02939
Plaintiff:
C. Lynnette Thomas
Defendant:
Summit County Children Services Board, Randy Flick, Patti Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
