Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Delmi Ramirez-Ramos, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3827
Petitioner:
DELMI YULIBETH RAMIREZ-RAMOS, JIMMY ISAAC ORTIZ-RAMIREZ and JAHIR DANIEL ORTIZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Isaac Langston
as 22-2100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC LANGSTON
Iris Izaguirre-Mendoza, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3726
Petitioner:
IRIS YOLANDA IZAGUIRRE-MENDOZA, JOSEP MAURICIO PINEDA-IZAGUIRRE and LUIS ISAAC PINEDA-IZAGUIRRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
John Harris v. James Smith, et al
as 22-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ISAAC HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES M. SMITH, President, Eastern Michigan University, RHONDA LONGWORTH, Provost and Executive Vice, EUNICE JEFFRIES and others
Brewster v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Isaac John Brewster
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Harris v. Detroit Pub Schools Community Dist, et al
as 22-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ISAAC HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT, DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, IRIS TAYLOR, Ph.D. and others
Donte Hill v. City of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 21-4168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONTE HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIOT ISAAC, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police
Dennis Barnette v. City of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 21-4169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS BARNETTE
Defendant:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIOT ISAAC, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Police
Isaac Gomez v. Metro Gov Nvl & Davidson Cnty
as 21-6093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC V. GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
