Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Michigan, State of v. Phillips
as 5:2023cv12572
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Justin Jarvis Jerome Phillips
Acheampong v. Worden & Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Juliet Acheampong
Defendant:
Worden & Associates, LLC, Joshua Samuel Mirel, Jarvis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joanne Moskovic, et al v. City of New Buffalo, MI
as 23-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANNE MOSKOVIC, ALEXANDER MOSKOVIC, GENE KHALIMSKY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW BUFFALO, MI, a municipal corporation
USA v. Jason Jarvis
as 22-3194
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON JARVIS
Joseph Jarvis v. Hines Furlong Line, Inc.
as 21-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HINES FURLONG LINE, INC.
Larry Tawney, Jr. v. Portage County, OH, et al
as 21-3809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY TAWNEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PORTAGE COUNTY, OH, BILL BURNS, In his official and individual capacities, DAVID W. DOAK, In his official and individual capacities and others
Jeff Daly, et al v. Charmaine McGuffey, et al
as 21-3266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS JARVIS and JEFF DALY
Defendant:
SHERIFF JIM NEIL, in his official capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MATT HAMILTON, Post Commander, in his official capacity, JOSEPH T. DETERS, in his official capacity as the Hamilton County Prosecutor, SHERIFF CHARMAINE MCGUFFEY and others
USA v. Jarvis Bennett
as 21-1137
Defendant / Appellant:
JARVIS XAVIER BENNETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Jefferson Cnty, KY Metro Govt, et al
as 21-501
Petitioner:
MARK E. BOLTON, in his capacity as the Director of Louisville, KY Metro Department of Corrections, ARNETTA AL-AMIN, In re: JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT and others
Respondent:
JACOB HEALEY, ALLEN GOODFLEISCH, BETTY MELLOAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
