Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Baker et al v. Ambasador Nursing and Rehab et al
as 4:2024cv10791
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker and Richard Perry
Defendant:
Ambasador Nursing and Rehab, Frank LNU, April LNU and others
Paul Drockton, Jr. v. Byron Belka, et al
as 24-3141
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. DROCKTON, JR.
Defendant:
BYRON BELKA, Individual and all owned entities, RAIN INTERNATIONAL LLC, Utah, Delaware and any other locations, TRAVIS PERRY, Individual and all owned entities and others
Drockton v. Belka et al.
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
Innovative Flexpak, Byron Belka, Rain International LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Drockton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bishop et al v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bishop and Charles Metzger
Defendant:
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH, INC., Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc. and Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
USA v. Rommie Perry, Jr.
as 23-3918
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMMIE PERRY, JR.
City Of Lakewood v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018op45240
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Lakewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45091
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
C.R.H Industrial Water, LLC et al v. Eiermann et al
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
C.R.H Industrial Water, LLC doing business as Western Reserve Pure Water and Western Reserve Industrial Water and C.R.H. Ohio, LTD.
Defendant:
Michael Eiermann, Andrew Bokovitz, Perry Celaschi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
