Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Rhodes v. Highland, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2023cv10964
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Rhodes
Defendant:
Highland, Charter Township of, Oakland County Sheriff, Craig Vradenburg and others
Concerned Citizens of West Tennessee v. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) et al
as 1:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Concerned Citizens of West Tennessee
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Farm Service Agency, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hai Nguyen, et al v. James Boylan, et al
as 21-6138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HAI NGUYEN, Administrator of the Estate of SABRINA NGUYEN, deceased,
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES BOYLAN, RUSSELL STEVENS, D. IGLEHARTE and others
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN
Darrin LaPine v. Booth, et al
as 21-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER BOOTH, SGT SLATER, CARMEN MCINTYRE, Correctional Medical Officer and others
Nguyen v. US Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 1:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
Bay Dinh Nguyen
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Darrin LaPine v. Jon Pavitt, et al
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellee:
SGAMBATI, ARUS, FROST, A/Sgt., ESU, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Duc Nguyen v. Michelle Floyd
as 20-2059
Petitioner / Appellant:
DUC VAN NGUYEN
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden and MICHELLE FLOYD
USA v. Brandon Nguyen
as 20-5933
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON NGUYEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Betty Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al
as 20-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY E. SMITH, in her capacity as attorney-in-fact for Dr. Paul C. Smith, individually and on behalf of the ERISA-covered plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR RYAN FRYMAN, DOCTOR HARRY NGUYEN and HPR CLINIC, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
