Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 24-1598
Plaintiff:
JON BUNCE, JASON WARREN, ALLEN HIGHLINE, Personal Rep and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
Kelsey Wolf, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02586
Defendant:
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Wolf, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner:
In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
City of Cleveland, OHIn re: City of Cleveland, OH
as 23-309
Petitioner:
In re: CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Respondent:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Michael Salazar v. Paramount Global
as 23-5748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SALAZAR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PARAMOUNT GLOBAL, dba 247Sports
General Motors, LLCIn re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-509
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
RILLA JEFFERSON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyIn re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 23-508
Petitioner:
In re: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
JESSICA CLIPPINGER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
US Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of v. Remelius et al
as 2:2023cv11113
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of
Defendant:
Robert Scott Remelius, Crystal H. Remelius, All Other Occupants and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
