Cases 1 - 10 of 45
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-106
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
McNeil et al v. Trinity Health Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00258
Plaintiff:
Brandi Wells, Jessica Sheets, Edward Wright and others
Defendant:
Trinity Health Corporation, Edward Lamb and Mount Carmel Health System
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin R. McDermott and Frank A Ray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
In re: Aaron Woodson
as 22-3022
Petitioner:
In re: AARON WOODSON
Respondent:
RICHARD BOWEN, Warden and RICHARD A. BOWEN, JR., Warden
Sean SwainIn re: Sean Swain
as 22-3467
Petitioner:
In re: SEAN PAUL SWAIN
Respondent:
RICHARD A. BOWEN, JR., Warden
Park National Bank - Trustee of the Mabel J. Bowen Irrevocable Trust v. Southwestern Energy Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv05803
Plaintiff:
Park National Bank - Trustee of the Mabel J. Bowen Irrevocable Trust and Park National Bank
Defendant:
Southwestern Energy Corporation, Montage Resources Corporation and Eclipse Resources I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamar Reese v. Richard Bowen
as 21-3595
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR REESE
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and RICHARD BOWEN, Warden
Secretary, Department of Agriculture, et al v. Premises Known and Described as Parcel ID 323012M036 et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Respondent:
Premises Known and Described as Parcel ID 323012M036, Premises Known and Described as Parcel ID 323012M073, Premises Known and Described as Parcel ID 323012M069 and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Shea and Thomas J. Vilsack
Brogan Rafferty v. Richard Bowen
as 20-4127
Petitioner / Appellant:
BROGAN W. RAFFERTY
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD BOWEN, Warden
USA v. Tony Bowen
as 20-6227
Defendant / Appellant:
TONY BOWEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Edward Bowen
as 20-1828
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD O'NEAL BOWEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
