Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Dancer et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Tyler Dancer, Deann Winfield, Shaprace Stegall and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Debra Shore, Marta Fuoco and others
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
USA v. Gerald Cummings
as 21-5934
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD LAMONT CUMMINGS
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Brian Fishback v. Ron Cummings, et al
as 21-5682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN FISHBACK
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE RON CUMMINGS, Warren County, KY, Fiscal Court, JUDGE EXECUTIVE MICHAEL O. BUCHANON, Warren County, KY, Fiscal Court, WARREN COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT and others
Percy CummingsIn re: Percy Cummings
as 21-1526
Petitioner:
In re: PERCY CUMMINGS
Respondent:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Scott Smith v. Shirley Harry, et al
as 21-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER LANG, B. SMITH, Deputy Warden, RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER CUMMINGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT SMITH
Samuel Cummings, Jr. v. Island Creek Coal Company, et al
as 21-3032
Respondent:
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Petitioner:
SAMUEL L. CUMMINGS, JR.
Sanqua Cummings v. Randee Rewerts
as 20-1095
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANQUA DION CUMMINGS
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Cummings v. National Credit Care Corporation
as 2:2019cv11818
Defendant:
National Credit Care Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Cummings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
