Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taylor et al v. KKR & Co., L.P. et al
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tia Taylor, Ashley Hall-Nagy and Bobby Estes
Defendant:
KKR & Co., L.P., Henry R. Kravis, George R. Roberts and others
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Westlake Vinyls, Inc. v. Cooke
as 3:2018mc00018
Petitioner:
Westlake Vinyls, Inc.
Respondent:
Kevin Cooke
Cook et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cook and Kathy Cook
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 (b)
Bell et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 5:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bell and James Hollingsworth
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, Lerner, Sampson & Rothfus Corporation, Whitney Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cellmark, Inc. v. Epcorp Limited et al
as 6:2014fj00003
Plaintiff:
Cellmark, Inc.
Defendant:
Epcorp Limited, Jeffrey Fitch and BIVAC North America, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Epcorp Limited and Jeffrey Fitch
Thirdparty_defendant:
Lawson & Cook Enterprises, Inc., BIVAC North America, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
