Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In re: Harvey Smith
as 13-5310
Movant: In re: HARVEY SMITH
Respondent: DAVID MILLS, Warden
Rebecca Wallace, et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-6305
Plaintiff - Appellee: REBECCA WALLACE, BARBARA WRIGHT and MADALYN SUOZZO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: FORTUNE HI-TECH MARKETING, INC., SCOTT AGUILAR, MOLLY AGUILAR and others
Jones v. Raye et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012mc00073
Plaintiff: Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant: Gayle Raye, Ricky Bell, Mike Crutcher and others
Chapman v. Bell et al
as 3:2011mc00049
Plaintiff: Chris Chapman
Defendant: Ricky Bell, Sandra Hall, (f/n/u) Mosby and others
Murdock et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00041
Plaintiff: Marshall H. Murdock, Charles H. Roberts, Julius Perkins and others
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Derrick R. Scholfield, Ruben Hodge and others
Lewis v. Mills
as 2:2011mc00003
Petitioner: Johnny Lee Lewis
Respondent: David Mills
Wallace et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00127
Plaintiff: Rebecca Wallace , Barbara Wright and Madalyn Suozzo
Defendant: Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. , Scott Aguilar , Molly Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff: Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant: Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Perry v. Mills
as 3:2009mc00152
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Perry
Respondent: David Mills
Radley v. Mills
as 3:2008mc00150
Petitioner: Corey Lamont Radley
Respondent: David Mills

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?