Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Alrelio Evans v. J. Atearn, et al
as 23-1553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS, named as Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT CHIEF J. ATEARN, in his individual capacity, WARDEN MATT MACAULEY, in his individual capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN R. BROWKAW, in his individual capacity and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
USA v. Christopher Houghton
as 20-1535
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CHARLES HOUGHTON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Atwood, et al v. UC Health, et al
as 20-3052
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, et al.,
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIRAM MCCAULEY, ROBERT HOUGHTON, JR., MICHAEL SANDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ABUBAKAR AITQ DURRANI, MD
Defendant:
UC HEALTH, et al.,
Christopher Atwood, et al v. UC Health, et al
as 20-3044
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD STANFIELD, DAVID SHEMPERT, ROBERT HOUGHTON, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ABUBAKAR AITQ DURRANI, MD
Defendant:
UC HEALTH
Christopher Atwood, et al v. UC Health, et al
as 20-3018
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOUGHTON, JR., REBEKAH BRADY, HIRAM MCCAULEY and others
Defendant:
WEST CHESTER HOSPITAL, LLC and UC HEALTH
Cross Appellant:
ABUBAKAR AITQ DURRANI, MD and CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Christopher Atwood, et al v. UC Health, et al
as 19-4248
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ATWOOD, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIRAM MCCAULEY, ROBERT HOUGHTON, JR., MICHAEL SANDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTER FOR ADVANCED SPINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ABUBAKAR AITQ DURRANI, MD
Defendant:
UC HEALTH and WEST CHESTER HOSPITAL, LLC
Aaron et al v. Hamilton County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson, Richard Elliott, Adrian Lilly and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk's Office, Hon. Mark Schweikert, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
