Cases 1 - 10 of 15
American Express National Bank v. Remelius
as 2:2024cv10453
Plaintiff:
American Express National Bank
Defendant:
Robert Scott Remelius
US Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of v. Remelius et al
as 2:2023cv11113
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and US Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of
Defendant:
Robert Scott Remelius, Crystal H. Remelius, All Other Occupants and others
Robert Scott v. International Paper Company, et al
as 21-5638
Appellee:
HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. and BROWN & ROOT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
Brown et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10699
Plaintiff:
Brenda Brown , Keri Webber , Michael Webber and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Michigan, State of , Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atkins et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2017cv13724
Plaintiff:
Melissa Atkins , Grace Howard , Elleane Raji and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , State of Michigan , State of MDEQ Michigan and others
Tamara Nappier v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 17-1401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAMARA NAPPIER, as mother and next friend of Takarie Nappier, a minor child, on behalf of Takarie Nappier and a class of all others similarly situated, Takarie Nappier
Defendant:
RICHARD SNYDER, DARNELL EARLEY, GERALD AMBROSE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL WYANT, LIANE SHEKTER SMITH, STEPHEN BUSCH and others
Nappier v. Snyder et al
as 1:2016cv00636
Plaintiff:
Tamara Nappier
Defendant:
Richard Snyder , Darnell Earley , Gerald Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Robert Sheppard
as 15-5970
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT SHEPPARD
USA v. Robert Manley
as 14-5979
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT MANLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
