Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Gable Services, LLC v. Elkins et al
as 2:2023cv11451
Plaintiff: Gable Services, LLC
Defendant: Juli Ann Elkins, Staff Heads, LLC, Dominick King and others
Rodney Nelson v. Rodney Ward, et al
as 21-6154
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY D. NELSON
Defendant / Appellee: RODNEY WARD, Unit Manager, SAMUEL J. PATRICK, Case Manager, JANE DOE, C-4 Unit Counselor and others
Alex Pedrin v. T. Middleton, et al
as 21-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALEX JOSEPH PEDRIN
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER T. MIDDLETON, USP-McCreary, OFFICER DAULTON, USP-McCreary, WARDEN CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, USP-McCreary and others
BST Holdings, LLC, et al v. OSHA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4080
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: BST HOLDINGS, LLC, RV TROSCLAIR, LLC, TROSCLAIR AIRLINE, LLC and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Amicus Curiae: BENTKEY SERVICES, LLC, dba Daily Wire, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE and AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae: NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor: CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Trent Young v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRENT YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Employer, JASMINA MASSEY, Prisoner Counselor, KIRT MAHAR, Mail Room Staff and others
Christopher North, et al v. Gayle Scanlon, et al
as 21-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER NORTH
Plaintiff: PATRICIA THOMPSON, sender of mail/legal mail and DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: GAYLE SCANLON, GOA-Mailroom Clerk, K. BROWN, GOA-Mailroom Clerk, L. BARNES, Grievance Coordinator and others
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5798
Plaintiff / Appellant: REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Rebekah Atkins v. Gregory Stivers, et al
as 21-5799
Plaintiff / Appellant: REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY N. STIVERS, DAVID J. HALE, CLARIA HORN BOOM and others
Skyworks, Ltd., et al v. CDC, et al
as 21-3563
Plaintiff / Appellee: CEDARWOOD VILLAGE APARTMENTS I & II OWNER B, LLC, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, SKYWORKS, LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellant: SHERRI A. BERGER, In her official capacity as Acting Chief of Staff, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?