Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Contreras v. UNUM Group Corporation
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jose Contreras
Defendant:
UNUM Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Unum Group Corporation
as 23-503
Petitioner:
In re: UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Respondent:
KERRY ANN LOOMIS, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, LISA LARENSEN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA DEPUYDT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Margaret Boersma v. Unum Life Ins Co of America, et al
as 21-5721
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARGARET BOERSMA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Larry Himes v. Provident Life and Accident
as 21-5541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LEE HIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, aka Unum Group Corporation
Cynthia Pittman, et al v. Unum Group, et al
as 20-5710
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL J. WAXENBERG, JOHN F. MCGARRY, RICHARD P. MCKENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CUNNINGHAM and CYNTHIA PITTMAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Not Classified By Court:
In re: UNUM GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF TAYLOR POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Drew Carson v. Unum Life Insurance Co.
as 19-3671
Defendant / Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, originally named as Unum Group Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DREW A. CARSON and DREW ALAN CARSON
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System v. UNUM Group et al (TV1)
as 1:2018cv00169
Defendant:
UNUM Group, Daniel J. Waxenberg, Steve Zabel and others
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pittman v. Unum Group et al (TV3)
as 1:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Unum Group, Richard P. McKenney, John F. McGarry and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pittman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
