Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase et al
as 2:2024cv10990
Plaintiff:
Sotero Lopez, III
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase, Rhonda Nixon and Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
Jackson v. State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2023cv13279
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
Whitney v. Corbin et al
as 4:2023cv10450
Plaintiff:
Harrison Whitney
Defendant:
Susan R. Corbin, Mhammad Elminini, US Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Kreps et al v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2022cv12020
Plaintiff:
Paul Kreps, Diana Boudrie, Zachary Brazil and others
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency, Julia Dale, Kimberly Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin Uglis v. State of Michigan Unemployment
as 20-2096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN PAUL UGLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY
Price v. Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2020cv12756
Plaintiff:
Curwood L. Price
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
Roy Carver, Jr. v. Houchens Food Group, Inc., et al
as 19-6262
Defendant:
CHARLES BLACK and HOUCHENS FOOD GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY ANDERSON CARVER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION
Stanely Kozlowski, III v. Michigan Unemployment In
as 16-2680
Debtor:
In re: STANELY RICHARD KOZLOWSKI, III
Appellant:
STANELY RICHARD KOZLOWSKI, III
Appellee:
MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY
Priscilla Andrews v. MI Unemployment Ins. Agency
as 16-2383
Debtor:
In re: PRISCILLA ANNETTE ANDREWS
Appellant:
PRISCILLA ANNETTE ANDREWS
Appellee:
MICHIGAN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY
Lillacalenia v. Employment & Training Office et al
as 3:2013cv01202
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
Employment & Training Office and Unemployment Insurance Appeals Branch
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
