Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Dailey v. Durrani et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff: Margaret Dailey
Defendant: Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Cincinnati Children's Hopital Medical Center , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02488
Plaintiff: Shawn Ervin Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02210
Plaintiff: Rodney Gene Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02183
Plaintiff: Carol Hubbard and Ronald Leo Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00992
Plaintiff: Donna Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01954
Plaintiff: Pamela Sue Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01876
Plaintiff: Gerald Ray Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01105
Plaintiff: Gary Lee Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00647
Plaintiff: Cecelia Anne Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drinkard et al v. Doe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv14598
Plaintiff: Nan Drinkard and Estate of Nancy Dailey
Defendant: John Doe, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?