Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Perkerson et al v. Panda Express, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00230
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Perkerson and Linda Perkerson
Defendant:
Panda Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Randolph v. MGR Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01012
Plaintiff:
Diane Randolph
Defendant:
MGR Express, Inc. and Abdulnasir Abdirizak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarenga v. Larry James Valley et al
as 3:2017cv00935
Plaintiff:
Fredy Armando Alvarenga
Defendant:
Larry James Valley and Taylor Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dozier, Jr. v. Octavio et al
as 3:2017cv00828
Plaintiff:
Norman Garland Dozier, Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Rocha Octavio and Florida Beauty Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swisher et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Randy Swisher, Sr. and Patricia Swisher
Defendant:
David A Williams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milburn et al v. Hudgens et al (TV3)
as 3:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Chris Milburn and Anita Milburn
Defendant:
Hugh D Hudgens, Shore Trucking Company, Inc., Averitt Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Close et al v. Cool Runnings Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Travis Close and Tina Close
Defendant:
Cool Runnings Express, Inc. and Benjamin Scott Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jurewicz et al v. CDJ Bulk Express, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Mark Jurewicz , Michaela Jurewicz and Brenda Jurewicz
Defendant:
CDJ Bulk Express, Inc. and Marcus Crunkleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinard v. R.T. Express, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Isaac Kinard
Defendant:
R.T. Express, Inc. and Seigryd Lostal-Carballo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Onixe Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
Danny Ward
Defendant:
Onixe Express, Inc. and Versily Sherbuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
