Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruppel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ruppel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gunter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Clyde Gunter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05639
Plaintiff:
Clyde Moore and Danita Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leeper v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05006
Plaintiff:
Clyde R Leeper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Peffly v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05700
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peffly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03087
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murriel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01662
Plaintiff:
Clyde S Murriel
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
