Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Holcomb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02429
Plaintiff:
Shelby Holcomb
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pett v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc.
as 2:2022cv11389
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Pett, Kathleen Fick-Gee, Michelle Holcomb and others
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, Inc.
Holcombe v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Holcombe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holcomb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00941
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenda Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv13313
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated and William Cook Europe ApS
Plaintiff:
Deborah Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2019cv00776
Plaintiff:
Bill Holcomb
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holcomb v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2017cv10355
Plaintiff:
Daneen Holcomb
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Pekin Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Rick Wells
Defendant:
Pekin Insurance Company , Secretary of Labor and Kayla Holcomb
Cross_claimant:
Pekin Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Kayla Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holcomb v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20552
Plaintiff:
Darvin Holcomb
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
