Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Howell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Leticia Howell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04047
Plaintiff:
David Howell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
Allen Howell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Bruce Howell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pio v. Howell Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pio
Defendant:
Howell Contractors, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Howell v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02850
Plaintiff:
Diane F. Howell
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell et al v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Cecil E. Howell and Debra L. Howell
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc., Fastbuy Inc., State of Ohio, Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Howell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01848
Plaintiff:
James Howell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Debbie Pollard Howell
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02226
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Tammy Howell and Jeffrey Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
