Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Holmes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Renae Holmes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gee v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04535
Plaintiff:
Rena Gee
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Altman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00736
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Renae Altman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spears-Kenard v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rena Spears-Kenard
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bonecutter et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02149
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bonecutter, Jr. and Darlene Renae Bonecutter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitnable v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Tamala Renae Whitnable
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riggs v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rena Riggs
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McFarland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
Sharla Rena McFarland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dewey-Morrison v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21221
Plaintiff:
Rena Dewey-Morrison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woody et al v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp23059
Plaintiff:
Rena Mae Woody and James Scott Woody
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
