Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carrillo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrillo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03512
Plaintiff:
Jaime Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Percy et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05928
Plaintiff:
Serafin Percy and Ramona Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrillo v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05838
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00713
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martin Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 7:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Carrillo
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01203
Plaintiff:
Leonard Anthony Carrillo and Gregory Powers
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. , Center For Toxicology and Environmental Health, LLC , Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
Leonard Anthony Carrillo and Gregory Powers
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. , The Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health, LLC , Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Carrillo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22802
Plaintiff:
Domingo Carrillo and Michelle Carrillo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
