Cases 11 - 20 of 312
St. Thomas v. State of Ohio et al.
as 4:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Howard St. Thomas
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Scott D. Hunter, Kenneth Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wypasek et al.
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
Clinton R. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Wypasek, Christopher J. Wilson and Warden Jennifer Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03275
Petitioner:
Scott Wood
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 1:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. May
as 2:2023cv02790
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scofield v. USA
as 2:2023cv02661
Petitioner:
David Scott Scofield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. May
as 3:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockhart v. Jarrett et al
as 3:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Lockhart
Defendant:
Vanessa Jarrett, Chelsea Mercer, Candice Talbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
