Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 23-5087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DORSEY, BOP Officer and UNKNOWN SUPERIOR OFFICERS
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Betty Williams, et al
as 23-5079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY WILLIAMS and NATHAN BURTON
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. USA
as 23-5072
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. USA
as 23-5049
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 22-6103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 2:2022cv02783
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Dorsey and Unknown Superior Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 22-5998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BOP OFFICER K. CAULEY, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, CAMP ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, ASSISTANT WARDEN HALL, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Unknown BOP Medical Staff
as 22-5977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN BOP MEDICAL STAFF, FCI Forrest City, AR
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Betty Williams, et al
as 22-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY WILLIAMS, Revenue Agent and NATHAN BURTON, State Department of Tennessee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
