Cases 11 - 20 of 17,820
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkins v. Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
as 2:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Lampkins
Defendant:
Center of Science and Industry (COSI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02835
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, BLAIR NANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02837
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, ROXANNE T. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Defendant:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Sergio D. Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaza v. Spatny
as 1:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Robert Plaza
Respondent:
Warden Jerry Spatny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
