Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Banks v. Pugh
as 4:2014cv01639
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Michael Pugh, Booz Allen Hamilton, Lennert Leader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2014cv01262
Petitioner:
Noe Rodriguez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hirsch v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2014cv00813
Petitioner:
Jens Hirsch
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gaybor v. Pugh et al
as 4:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Christian E. Gaybor
Defendant:
Michael Pugh , Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons , Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Zickefoose et al
as 4:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Gary Zickefoose, Michael Pugh, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2013cv02633
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Miller
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Hinojoza v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2013cv02467
Petitioner:
Miguel Hinojoza
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sargent v. Coakley et al
as 4:2013cv01702
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sargent
Defendant:
J. Coakley, Federal Satellite Low Elkton, D. Zickerfoose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sargent v. Coakley
as 4:2013cv01657
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sargent
Defendant:
J. Coakley, Federal Satellite Low Elkton and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2013cv01194
Plaintiff:
Victor Mercado
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.