Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Washington v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00765
Petitioner:
Larry Washington
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Penson v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01152
Petitioner:
George Washington Penson, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Spradlin et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Washington
Defendant:
C/O Spradlin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan et al v. Washington Labs et al
as 5:2012cv01532
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan, Marcus Corley, Richard Patterson and others
Defendant:
Washington Labs , Federal Bureau of Investigation , South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2012cv00103
Petitioner:
Kenneth T. Washington
Respondent:
Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Morgan
as 5:2012cv00084
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Washington
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2011cv00269
Petitioner:
Lamarr Washington
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yuante Washington v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institute
as 3:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
Kurran Yuante Washington
Defendant:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D.C. v. Riley et al
as 2:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
D.C.
Defendant:
Gary Riley, Thomas Richardson and Otis Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
