Cases 71 - 80 of 138
Gambino v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv00817
Plaintiff:
David A. Gambino
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Dennis Johnson, Sean Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Valderrama v. Pugh
as 4:2013cv00724
Petitioner:
Miguel Garcia-Valderrama
Respondent:
Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sundstrom v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 4:2013cv00707
Petitioner:
Daniel Harold Sundstrom
Respondent:
Correction Corporation of America, NEOCC, Michael Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fountain v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Daniel Antonio Fountain, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden, Franklin Medical Center, Business Office of Franklin Medical Center and Jeter-Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3332
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Besic v. Pugh
as 4:2013cv00598
Petitioner:
Mario Besic
Respondent:
Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguilera v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2013cv00513
Petitioner:
Moises Aguilera
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. U. S. Marshal
as 4:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
U. S. Marshal , Michael Pugh and Transcor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv00335
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Michael Pugh, Anthony Pastillo, Lala Erie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edmonds v. Pugh
as 4:2013cv00301
Petitioner:
Jermaine Edmonds
Respondent:
Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
