Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Carpenter v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Defendant:
L.T. Troy Wilson, Deanna Noble, Daniel Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marlon Carpenter
Defendant:
Troy Wilson, Deanna Noble, Daniel Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Logan County et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Logan County, Christphor Michael Trimmer, Juana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. LeMasters
as 0:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffery Scott Jones
Respondent:
David LeMasters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bells Jr. et al v. Schaffer
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Dr. Charlie Buddha Bells, Jr. and Jeffery Brian Denning
Defendant:
Kenny Schaffer
Johnson v. Kimbro et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Kimbro, Ofc Piszner, Captain Mike Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tingler et al
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Nurse Tingler, Dr Fortwegler and Wellpath/CCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gonzalas et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson and Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Captain Gonzalas, Major Travis St Clair, HSA John Brinker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
