Cases 1 - 10 of 12,909
Adams v. USA
as 6:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Justin Blake Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rice v. Dardanelle
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Antonio Rice
Respondent:
Arkansas Police Department Dardanelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Small v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Kevin Small and Arthur Greentree
Not Yet Classified:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole Detainer/Warrant #4383V
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coursey v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Coursey
Defendant:
Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roth v. Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Nathan Donald Roth
Defendant:
Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. USA
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Douglas M. Edmonson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morris v. USA
as 3:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Leroy Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown v. USA
as 5:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Lamonte H. Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stickney v. Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Stickney
Respondent:
Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Turner, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
