Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rogers v. Bazzel et al
as 3:2011cv01172
Plaintiff:
Phillippe Rogers
Defendant:
Judd Bazzel, Amy Jones, ABL Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillippe Rogers v. Davidson County Sherif's Offic, et al
as 09-6376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIPPE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIF'S OFFICE, (DCSO), ABL FOODSERVICE, CORRECT CARE SOLLUTIONS, (CCS) and others
Colhouer v. Anderson, et al.
as 3:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
David Charles Colhouer
Defendant:
Mike Anderson, Kathy Seignethaler, Jeff Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitford v. Taite
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Rolly Whitford
Defendant:
Constance Taite, Jeremy McCraw, Michael Colavecchio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingram v. Hall et al
as 3:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Ingram
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Austin Bodie, Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2008cv00547
Petitioner:
Phillippe Rogers
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, ABL Foodservice, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ingram v. Hall et al
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Ingram
Defendant:
Daron Hall, President - C.C.S. and Judd Bazzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2007cv01026
Plaintiff:
Roger K. Lane
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Correct Care Solutions, (f/n/u) Bazzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitson v. Davidson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff:
Geatano Orlando Whitson
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Department, (f/n/u) Bazzel, treating physician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
