Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Joseph Luney v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6137
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY LUNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Respondent:
JACK CONWAY, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Hale, et al vs. Tirey, et al
as 1:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis T. Pate and Michael Douglas
Defendant:
Tirey, Blakley, Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01225
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and David Theophilius Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Allen Bargery, William Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2 et al
as 1:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and Terry Eugene Atkins, Jr.
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2, Special Needs DeBerry and Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
as 1:2011cv01172
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
as 1:2011cv01171
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Atkins
as 1:2011cv01167
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
Terry Eugene Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
as 1:2011cv01164
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale and Michael Douglas
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
as 1:2011cv01163
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale and Lewis T. Pate
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Wright
as 1:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
Jacques Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
