Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Marion County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Amanda Martin
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Department, Jimmy Clements, Tristan Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Knox County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Knox County Attorney Assistant, Knox County Sheriff's Department, Knox County Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Knox County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Department, Skip Hammons and Gilbert E. Holland
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michael John Robert
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 4:2019cv00010
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
The President of the U.S.A., Wash, D.C., The U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catoe v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
John Robert Catoe
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners, Christy Abrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense
as 3:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Wooden et al
as 4:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
John Robert Wooden, Denny Crum and Bill Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
