Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dominique Brock-Butler v. Phillip Parker, et al
as 16-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINIQUE J. BROCK-BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER, Jailer, JIMMY LAMB, Chief Deputy, CHERIE BELT, Sergeant and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE NOS. 1-6, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Joe Browder, Jr. v. KY State Prison Officials, et al
as 15-5918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Brock-Butler v. Parker et al
as 5:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Dominique J. Brock-Butler
Defendant:
Phillip Parker, Jimmy Lamb, Athena Abshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock-Butler v. Parker et al
as 5:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Dominique Brock-Butler
Defendant:
Phillip Parker, Jimmy Lamb, Cherie Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karl Kraus, Jr. v. Aaron Smith
as 14-5747
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARL KRAUS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER, Warden
Karl Kraus, Jr. v. Aaron Smith
as 14-5748
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARL KRAUS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER, Warden
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Ky State Prison Officials, et al
as 13-6659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, John Does and Jane Does, PHILLIP PARKER, Warden, JOHN DOE, President of Correctcare Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Cox v. Parker et al
as 5:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Phillip Parker and LaDonna Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayford Poole v. Phillip Parker
as 11-6200
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYFORD E. POOLE
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP PARKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
