Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United Automobile, Aerospace, et al v. Hardin County, Kentucky, et al
as 16-5246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, Local 3047, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC, INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
HARDIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, HARRY L. BERRY, Judge/Executive, JOHN WARD, Sheriff and others
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al v. Hardin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Local 3047 United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America , International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC , International Chemical Workers Union Council fo the United Food and Commercial Workers and others
Defendant:
Hardin County, Kentucky, Harry L. Berry, Charlie A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds et al v. DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv10301
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds and Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds, Trustees of
Defendant:
DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated, James C DeAngelis, James M DeAngelis and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds et al v. DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv10802
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds and Operating Engineers Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds, Trustees of
Defendant:
DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated, DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated, DeAngelis Landscape, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
