Cases 91 - 100 of 142
Rajapakse v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2016cv13144
Plaintiff:
Samantha Rajapakse
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Schofield v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2016cv10521
Plaintiff:
James Schofield
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Majors v. U.S. Auto Sales, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13609
Defendant:
U.S. Auto Sales, Inc. and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Barbara Majors
Counter_claimant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Barbara Majors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2015cv13165
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and Kaleayah Jackson
Plaintiff:
Vedia L Jones
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Kaleayah Jackson
Shanta Corporation v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv11437
Plaintiff:
Shanta Corporation d/b/a St. Anne's Convalescent Center
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation , Jason Michael Katz, P.C. and Jason M Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hampton et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv11338
Plaintiff:
Princess Hampton and Shantel Hampton
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation , Big Three Auto Sales, Inc., ADESA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Betty Taylor v. Black Hawk Recovery, et al
as 15-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
BLACK HAWK RECOVERY, CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION and UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Cornist v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2015cv10913
Plaintiff:
Roberta Cornist
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
