Cases 91 - 100 of 146
Martin-Dobson v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
Mark Bryan Martin-Dobson
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Beth Gentry, M. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin-Dobson v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv01144
Plaintiff:
Mark Bryan Martin-Dobson
Defendant:
Daron Hall, f/n/u Crawley, Gearl Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cloyd v. Dulin et al
as 3:2012cv01088
Plaintiff:
La'Roy Jonathan Cloyd
Defendant:
Vernestene Dulin , L. McKendra, Ray Doizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gifford v. D.C.S.O., et al
as 3:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Gifford
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Dan Weikal, Jamie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hall, et al
as 3:2012cv01022
Petitioner:
Reese L. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Daron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv01011
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
Daron Hall , Victor S. (Torry) Johnson, III and Mark J. Fishburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Williams v. Hall et al
as 3:2012mc00067
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
Daron Hall , Victor S. (Torry) Johnson, III and Mark J. Fishburn
Williams v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2012cv00932
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Williams
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Garen Blanchard and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
Eddie G. Jones
Defendant:
Daron Hall, f/n/u Stinson, f/n/u Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
