Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Roach v. Hiland et al
as 5:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Antoine Roach
Defendant:
Steve Hiland and Chanin Hiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom et al v. Hiland et al
as 5:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom, II and Jason L. Banks
Defendant:
Steve Hiland, Chanin Hiland, Doug Crall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hiland et al
as 5:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Banks
Defendant:
Steve Hiland, Chanin Hiland, Doug Crall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Smith v. John Rees, et al
as 11-6367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT R. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN D. REES, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE HILAND, MD, TERRI JONES and BRUCE BAUER
Robbin Hines v. Steve Hiland, et al
as 11-5921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIN HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE HILAND, M.D. and JOHN DOES 1-30
Rickey Jones v. Kentucky Department of Correct, et al
as 11-5350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES NETWORK, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE and others
Lucas v. Kentucky State Prison Officials et al
as 3:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Lucas
Defendant:
Kentucky State Prison Officials, Philip Parker, Victoria Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Burke, Jr. v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 10-6409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Defendant:
LADONNA H. THOMPSON and ALAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE HILAND, CHANIN HILAND and JOHN WOOD
Grimes v. Hiland et al
as 5:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rodney Grimes
Defendant:
Chanin Hiland, Steve Hiland and John Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paddock v. Woods et al
as 5:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Darrin Paddock
Defendant:
John Woods and Steve Hiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
