Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Reliable Investments, LLC
as 2:2015cv10751
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Reliable Investment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Total Metal Services, LLC
as 2:2014cv12478
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Total Metal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Condor Piping, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15007
Defendant:
Condor Piping, Inc. , Condor Piping, Incorporated , Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Condor Piping, Inc. and Condor Piping, Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hilliker v. Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv14449
Plaintiff:
Allen Hilliker
Defendant:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Acuity Insurance Company v. PACCAR, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00923
Plaintiff:
Acuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acuity Insurance Company v. Pro Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Acuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pro Services, Inc., D9 Systems, Inc. and AVB Triangle Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acuity Insurance Company v. Pro Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Acuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pro Services, Inc., D9 Systems, Inc. and AVB Triangle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peacock et al v. Acuity Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv14805
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Peacock and Glenn Peacock
Defendant:
Acuity Insurance Company
Redeeming Love Christian Embassy v. Acuity Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv11409
Plaintiff:
Redeeming Love Christian Embassy
Defendant:
Acuity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
