Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Protus IP Solutions, Incorporated v. C C, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009mc51016
Petitioner:
Protus IP Solutions, Incorporated, Protus IP Solutions, Incorporated, Protus IP Solutions, Incorporated and others
Respondent:
C C, Incorporated and L M
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Price v. L-M Asphalt Partners, Ltd. et al
as 5:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Price and Michael Lee Price
Defendant:
L-M Asphalt Partners, Ltd., L-M Holdings, Inc., Charles Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Montgomery v. L & M Trucking and Equipment Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00046
Defendant:
L & M Trucking and Equipment Co., Inc., Larry Mullins, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Heyer et al v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Board et al
as 5:2007cv00308
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Board, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Corporation, Michael A. Gobb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash
Heyer et al v. USA et al
as 5:2007cv00273
Defendant:
USA, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Board, Lexington-Fayette Urban County Airport Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Electrical Workers Local 252 Pension Plan et al v. L. M. Schafer-Electrical Construction, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv11691
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Local 252 Pension Plan, Electrical Workers Local 252 Health and Welfare Plan, Electrical Workers Local 252 Defined Contribution/401(K) Plan and others
Defendant:
L. M. Schafer-Electrical Construction, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
