Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Talal v. Little et al
as 3:2009mc00172
Plaintiff: Lutfi Shafq Talal
Defendant: George Little and Tennessee Department of Correction
Edward Owens v. George Little, et al
as 09-5796
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD L. OWENS
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE LITTLE, TDOC Commissioner, TONY PARKER, NWCX Warden and SAMANTHA PHILLIPS
Arendall v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00636
Petitioner: William David Arendall
Respondent: Tennessee Department of Correction, George Little and Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lutfi Talal v. Quenton White, et al
as 09-5707
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUTFI SHAFQ TALAL
Defendant - Appellee: QUENTON WHITE, Commissioner, HOWARD COOK, Assistant Commissioner, FLORA HOLLAND, Warden, Warden and others
Priest v. Little et al
as 3:2009cv00546
Plaintiff: Robert Priest
Defendant: George Little, Ricky Bell and Roland Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Priest v. Little et al
as 3:2009mc00121
Plaintiff: Robert Priest
Defendant: George Little, Ricky Bell and Roland Colson
Kelley v. CCA at SCCC et al
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff: Ezra M. Kelley
Defendant: CCA at SCCC, TN Dept. of Corrections and George Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. CCA at SCCC et al
as 1:2009mc00011
Plaintiff: Ezra M. Kelley
Defendant: CCA at SCCC, TN Dept. of Corrections and George Little
Choate v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00441
Plaintiff: James Choate
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, George Little, Reuben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Little et al
as 3:2009mc00106
Plaintiff: Omowale Ashanti Shabazz
Defendant: George Little, Reuben Hodge, Ricky Bell and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?