Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Smith v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00485
Plaintiff:
Patrick E.L. Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Turney Center Industrial Prison, James Fortner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009mc00107
Plaintiff:
Patrick E.L. Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Turney Center Industrial Prison, James Fortner and others
Poindexter v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2009cv01087
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Poindexter
Defendant:
Tennessee Dept. of Correction, Northwest Correctional Complex, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Forster v. Little
as 3:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Forster
Defendant:
George M. Little
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jaki Akai Mahammad v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 09-5295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAKI AKAI XAVIER MAHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, BOB COOPER and GEORGE M. LITTLE
Mahammad v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jaki Akai Xavier Mahammad
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Bob Cooper and George M. Little
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Little et al
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joe Martin
Defendant:
George M. Little, Thomas Mills, Alvin Minnick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 3:2008cv01219
Petitioner:
Gabble Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Roberta J. Anderson, George M. Little and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Little et al
as 3:2008mc00295
Plaintiff:
Joe Martin
Defendant:
George M. Little, Thomas Mills, Alvin Minnick and others
LaBryant King v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 08-6483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LABRYANT KING
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, Govenor, TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
