Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Whelco Industrial Ltd. v. USA/IRS
as 08-3153
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
WHELCO INDUSTRIAL LTD.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Whelco Industrial Ltd. v. USA/IRS
as 08-3154
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
WHELCO INDUSTRIAL LTD.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and J.M.S. Nursing Pool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Bestcare Travel Staffing, LLC v. Maslowski et al
as 5:2007cv00297
Plaintiff:
Bestcare Travel Staffing, LLC and Bestcare Travel Staffing, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel F. Maslowski, Mary B. Cheek, Bestaff, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Western Reserve Bank v. Pride One Omni Realty LTD. et al
as 1:2007cv00917
Plaintiff:
Western Reserve Bank and Western Reserve Bank
Defendant:
Pride One Omni Realty LTD., Pride One Omni Realty LTD., Pride One Omni Realty LTD. and others
Counter-Claimant:
Pride One Omni Realty LTD., Pride One Omni Realty LTD., Pride One Omni Realty LTD. and others
Counter-Defendant:
Jim Rowan Plumbing, Inc. and Jim Rowan Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Lewis v. USA
as 06-5957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS P. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Internal Revenue Service)
Third Party:
RONALD EDMONDS
Lewis v. USA
as 06-5959
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Internal Revenue Service)
Third Party - Appellant:
RONALD EDMONDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
